Musk Loses OpenAI Lawsuit — But Legal Experts Say He Won’t Stop Fighting

Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against OpenAI and co-founder Sam Altman, BBC Business reported Monday, marking the latest courtroom defeat for the world’s wealthiest person. Musk quickly attacked the ruling on X, calling the judge a “terrible activist” and announcing plans to appeal.

A String of Losses Keeps Growing

The OpenAI verdict is not an isolated setback. Late last year, Musk reached a settlement with former X employees after years of attempting to avoid paying severance. In March, investors won a case against him, arguing his public statements during the Twitter acquisition were misleading. That same month, a judge dismissed his suit against advertisers who had abandoned the platform. A separate ruling in May found that DOGE-driven grant cuts constituted unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. The defeats now span multiple courts and jurisdictions.

What the Legal Record Actually Shows

Legal scholars say the pattern is notable but unlikely to change Musk’s behavior. Shubha Ghosh, a law professor at Syracuse University, told BBC Business that Musk resembles many businesspeople asserting their legal rights aggressively. Ghosh stopped short of calling the filings abusive, though he questioned their overall effectiveness. Dorothy Lund, a Columbia Law School professor, was more direct. She argued that no one has yet imposed consequences meaningful enough to alter his approach.

Background — Penalties That Barely Register

The scale of Musk’s fortune makes standard financial penalties largely symbolic. A $1.5 million SEC fine for failing to disclose his early Twitter stock accumulation represented a rounding error against his net worth. When a Delaware court invalidated his multibillion-dollar Tesla pay package in late 2024, he simply reincorporated Tesla in Texas and secured a fresh shareholder approval. His anticipated status as the world’s first trillionaire, driven largely by his SpaceX stake ahead of a potential public listing, only widens that gap further.

Unconventional Even by Aggressive Standards

Lund drew a comparison to Carl Icahn, the famed corporate raider whose reputation inspired the Gordon Gekko character in Wall Street. Even Icahn, she noted, did not match Musk’s apparent indifference to public and legal consequences. Musk chose to move forward with SpaceX’s IPO preparations during the height of the Altman trial, flouting the customary quiet period that most pre-listing executives observe carefully. That willingness to absorb hits and press forward, Lund said, is a trait that can be valuable in entrepreneurs but does not always translate well inside a courtroom.

Read Next: OpenAI Raises $40B in Largest Private AI Funding Round Ever