UK Seals £3.7 Billion Trade Deal With Gulf States

BBC Business reported Thursday that the UK has struck a UK Gulf trade deal valued at £3.7 billion with six member states of the Gulf Co-operation Council. The agreement covers Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

What the Agreement Covers

Once fully in force, the deal is projected to strip approximately £580 million annually in tariffs from British goods heading to the region. Specific products set to benefit include cheddar cheese, butter, and chocolate. The government also says the accord will ease market entry for British companies seeking partnerships or expansion across Gulf markets.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called it a “huge win” for British workers and businesses, arguing that ordinary people would see wage growth and broader opportunities over time. Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle said the announcement signalled confidence to UK exporters at a moment of heightened global instability.

Background and Broader Context

The GCC pact is the third trade deal completed under the Starmer government, following agreements with India and South Korea. The UK has also separately finalised arrangements with the United States and the European Union. Notably, officials are billing the GCC agreement as the first ever struck between a G7 nation and the Gulf bloc, a distinction the government is leaning on heavily in its messaging.

Negotiations were originally launched under the previous Conservative administration. The Tories welcomed the result but framed it as a Brexit dividend they feared Labour might squander through its closer tilt toward Brussels.

Also Read: What the UK-India Trade Deal Means for British Business

Rights Groups Push Back

Not everyone is celebrating. The Trade Justice Movement warned the agreement carries serious risks across human rights, labour protections, and climate commitments. The group specifically flagged the GCC’s restrictions on press freedom, use of capital punishment, and the outsized carbon footprint of its oil-dependent economies. In their sharpest criticism, campaigners argued the deal deepens UK ties with some of the world’s most restrictive governments for economic returns too small to justify the tradeoffs.

Chris Southworth, secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce UK, defended the deal, telling BBC News that trade is not the appropriate mechanism for resolving human rights disputes. He argued that deeper commercial links over time create the influence and mutual investment needed to shape relationships.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves added her voice, describing the agreement as proof the government is positioning British firms to compete and succeed internationally.

Read Next: UK and South Korea Sign Trade Deal Covering Bentleys and Scottish Salmon