U.S. Proposes Fresh Tariffs on 60 Economies Over Forced Labor Trade Practices
CNBC reported Tuesday that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has proposed additional import duties on goods from 60 economies. The action targets trading partners that have failed to adequately restrict imports of goods produced through forced labor.
A Sweeping Penalty Across Major Trading Partners
The proposed forced labor tariffs would apply to some of Washington’s most significant commercial relationships. That list includes China, the European Union and Japan. USTR Jamieson Greer framed the move as a direct response to an unfair competitive environment facing American workers. He said the United States would no longer tolerate disparities that allow forced labor goods to undercut domestic producers.
The agency invoked Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, a broad trade enforcement tool. USTR found that all 60 named economies either failed to impose or failed to meaningfully enforce bans on forced labor imports.
Two-Tier Duty Structure and a Textile Carve-Out
USTR structured the proposed penalties in two bands. Economies that have enacted at least a partial ban on forced labor goods would face a 10% duty. All remaining economies would be subject to a higher 12.5% rate. That distinction is designed to reward incremental progress while still penalizing inaction.
A separate textile provision was also included in the proposal. It would permit some apparel and textile shipments from qualifying economies to enter the United States at reduced duty rates up to a certain import volume. The carve-out suggests an effort to limit disruption in supply chains that are heavily dependent on lower-income manufacturing nations.
Also Read: Trump’s Tariff Pause Explained: What Changes and What Doesn’t
Background: Forced Labor Enforcement as a Trade Weapon
Forced labor restrictions have steadily expanded as a U.S. trade enforcement priority. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, signed in 2021, established a rebuttable presumption that goods from China’s Xinjiang region involve forced labor. That law shifted the burden of proof onto importers. USTR’s new action extends similar logic far beyond China. It signals that Washington views forced labor enforcement as a systemic issue demanding multilateral compliance, not a bilateral dispute.
Greer noted that some partners have taken initial steps through frameworks like USMCA and bilateral trade agreements. He nonetheless insisted each economy must do considerably more.
Also Read: What Is Section 301 and How Does It Work
What Comes Next
USTR is expected to open a public comment period before any duties take effect. Affected economies may push back through diplomatic channels or seek carve-outs. The scale of the proposal, covering 60 economies simultaneously, represents one of the broadest single Section 301 actions in recent memory.
Read Next: U.S. Trade Policy in 2026: A Running Timeline of Tariff Actions
