U.S. and Iran Exchange Fire in the Strait of Hormuz

U.S. and Iranian forces opened fire on one another in the Strait of Hormuz late Thursday, CNBC reported, with Washington and Tehran each insisting the other side struck first.

Competing Accounts of Who Fired First

U.S. Central Command said three Navy destroyers transiting the strait came under attack by Iranian missiles, drones, and small watercraft. CENTCOM said its forces responded in self-defense, destroying inbound threats and hitting Iranian launch sites, command nodes, and surveillance infrastructure. The statement said no American assets were damaged.

Iran’s military told state media a different story. An Iranian spokesperson said U.S. forces struck an Iranian tanker moving through coastal waters, violating the existing ceasefire. Iran claimed it then retaliated against American vessels east of the strait, asserting the counterattack caused significant damage.

Also Read: Oil Prices Surge as Middle East Tensions Escalate

How the Ceasefire Reached This Point

The truce between Washington and Tehran took effect on April 8, framed initially as a two-week temporary halt to hostilities. President Donald Trump subsequently extended the agreement unilaterally. But both sides have since traded accusations of violations, and the agreement had already been visibly weakened before Thursday’s exchange.

CENTCOM’s statement following the Hormuz incident made no reference to the ceasefire whatsoever. The White House, when contacted by CNBC, directed reporters to CENTCOM’s statement without additional comment.

Also Read: Iran Nuclear Talks Timeline and What Each Side Wants

Trump Frames Strikes as a Warning, Not a Rupture

Despite the severity of the exchange, Trump sought to minimize the episode publicly. Speaking to an ABC News reporter by phone, he insisted the ceasefire remained intact and described the strikes as nothing more than a minor reprimand. He later posted on Truth Social claiming U.S. forces “completely destroyed” the Iranian assets involved, including boats and drones. Trump’s post mixed bravado with a direct warning, stating Iran would face far heavier strikes if it failed to finalize a nuclear agreement quickly.

The timing compounds the tension. Iranian officials had reportedly been reviewing a fresh U.S. nuclear proposal when Thursday’s exchange erupted. Whether that review continues now remains unclear.

The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly a fifth of global oil supplies and sits at the heart of the broader conflict’s economic risk. Any sustained disruption to shipping through the chokepoint would send immediate shockwaves through energy markets worldwide.

Read Next: What a Disrupted Strait of Hormuz Means for Global Oil Prices